Contact hours: 3 hours.
Learning objective and out comes.
At the end of completing the course material the learner will be able to:
- Understand the definition and diagnostic criteria of substance use disorders.
- Understand the risk factors for SUD and the additional risk factors for nurses.
- Understand the pathophysiology of SUD.
- Identify signs and symptoms of impairment of a co-worker while on duty.
- Identify commonly occurring behaviors and actions in nurses involved in diversion.
- Describe the nurse’s role in reporting a suspected SUD.
- Identify common barriers to reporting an impaired nurse and strategies that can be used to overcome them.
- Identify ways bias and stigma can impact those with SUD.
- Explain the treatment options for SUD.
- Explain the difference between disciplinary action from the board of nursing and alternative-to-discipline programs.
Introduction
Substance use disorder (SUD) is a complex condition characterized by a cluster of cognitive,
behavioral, and physiological symptoms indicating an uncontrolled use of a substance despite harmful
consequences. Though significant impairments in daily functioning set in, people with SUD typically
present with an intense focus on these substances. The diagnosis of SUDs can be applied to alcohol,
tobacco, cannabis, hallucinogens, inhalants, opioids, sedatives, and stimulant use (APA, 2013).
According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2022), millions
of Americans ages 12 and up suffer from SUD. For nurses, the rate of SUDs closely mirrors that of
the general population. Prescription medications, including opioids, are more frequently misused by
nurses compared to the general population (Trinkoff et al., 2022).
There has been significant progress over time in the understanding of SUDs as an illness needing
treatment rather than a moral failure requiring penalties. These changes are reflected in nursing
through programs that promote the treatment of impaired nurses and re-entry into the workforce.
Nurses play a critical role in creating awareness, correcting myths, and identifying, and reporting
suspected SUD. With a good understanding of the presentation and treatment resources, nurses are
better equipped to seek help for themselves and other nurses (NCSBN, 2014).
Historical Perspective of SUD and Shifting Trends
History of the Relationship Between People and Substances
The history of substance use is as long as human history itself. While it is not within the scope
of this article to provide an in-depth look at the long and complex relationship people have
with substances, some general historical context will be provided to frame the shift in
approaches that shape today’s treatment of SUD. This relationship looks different across
cultures depending on the substance type plus religious, geographical, sociopolitical, cultural,
and industrial influences. In the United States, it wasn’t until the mid-1800s that substance
use began to be looked upon as socially displeasing. In the early 20th century, some substances
were criminalized (Robinson & Adinoff, 2016).
Early 20th-century treatment approaches were based on the assumption that substance misuse was a
moral failing and that the condition fell outside the scope of medicine. Rather than a disease,
addiction was seen as a behavior violating religious, moral, and legal codes. Abstinence and
willpower were the cures for moral failings and behaviors. In the first edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) in the 1950s, substance use was mostly viewed as part of
other psychological problems. Around the same time, the American Medical Association (AMA)
followed the lead of the World Health Organization (WHO) by viewing alcoholism as a medical
disorder. The third edition of the DSM was the first time that substance use was classified
independently. The late 20th century brought many scientific advances in mental health and new
information about the pathophysiology of substance use and addiction changed the way substance
use was approached in medicine. Overall, there has been significant progress in the field of
SUDs. An improved understanding of the disease of substance use has led to a push towards
treatment and not punishment (Robinson & Adinoff, 2016).
Societal Viewpoint of Addiction Influences Nursing
Despite advances in the literature, there is still a pervasive stigma associated with SUDs.
Critics of addiction as a disease contend that there are no addicts, only bad decision-makers
(Henden et al., 2013). Likewise, nursing regulatory bodies historically framed addiction as
autonomous, rational choices rather than compulsive behaviors that are a disease consequence. As
a result, regulatory bodies would publicly report nurses and take punitive action (Dunn, 2005).
In a 2019 cross-sectional study of boards of nursing discipline data, substance misuse was the
most common reason for state boards of nursing to take disciplinary actions against a nurse
(Zhong, Martin, & Alexander, 2022).
Fortunately, there is a shift towards treating nurses with SUD rather than punishing them.
Leading nursing organizations now embrace the medical model over the moral model. The American
Nurses Association (ANA) endorses the position of the Emergency Nurses Association and the
International Nurses Society on Addictions in the organizations' joint statement: "Drug
diversion, in the context of personal use, is viewed primarily as a symptom of a serious and
treatable disease, and not exclusively as a crime" (ANA, 2016). Likewise, the National Council
of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) views SUD as a chronic, primary, and progressive disease
requiring treatment (NCSBN, 2014).
Overview of SUD
Pathology Pathways in SUD
The pathophysiology of SUD is incredibly complex. It involves many neurobiological mechanisms in
various parts of the brain, genetics and epigenetic changes, and psychosocial aspects (Uhl,
Koob, & Cable, 2019). It is outside of the scope of this article to comprehensively cover all of
these topics, however, a general overview will be discussed to aid in understanding the clinical
manifestations of the disease and targeted treatment.
Neurological Pathways in SUD (The Reward System)
Neuroscience has come a long
way in identifying the areas of the brain involved in reward. The brain reward system is called
the mesolimbic system, and it is composed of brain structures responsible for mediating the
physiological and cognitive process of reward. Neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and
beta-endorphins, facilitate communication to the reward center with dopamine playing the most
critical role (Bettinardi-Angres & Angres, 2010; Lewis, Florio, Ponzo & Borrelli, 2021).
Ten separate classes of drugs have known effects on the brain reward system (see Table 1). These
substances can directly activate the reward pathways and usually produce a more intense
activation than normal adaptive behaviors. Besides caffeine, all these substances can cause a
substance use disorder (APA, 2013).
Table 1. Classes of Substances that Have Known Effects on the Brain Reward System
(APA, 2013).
Caffeine |
Cannabis |
Hallucinogens |
Inhalants |
Opioids |
Sedatives |
Hypnotics |
Anxiolytics |
Stimulants |
Tobacco |
Reward is the brain’s natural adaptive process of associating different stimuli (generated from
activities or events such as eating, sleeping, sex, exercise, and social interactions) with a
positive or desirable outcome. A memory of the desired outcome is created leading to an
adjustment in the individual’s behavior to a search for a positive outcome (Lewis, Florio, Ponzo
& Borrelli, 2021; Bettinardi-Angres & Angres, 2010). For an individual with SUD, the pathway
involved in essential behaviors, such as eating, sleeping, and sex, is taken over by the
substance of choice which then eventually depletes the reward system and fails to maintain a
positive outcome. The individual’s initial motivation may have been to feel pleasure or relieve
discomfort. Eventually, the reward pathway becomes less sensitive or insensitive to the natural
stimuli and rather provides positive feedback when the substance is used. The individual’s brain
then begins to rely on the substance to create a positive outcome (Bettinardi-Angres & Angres,
2010).
Abnormally High Response to Substances
Using Positron emission tomography (PET)
scans and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), several studies have demonstrated a significant
difference in the way the brain reward system reacts to substances in previous users or people
with a family history of addiction versus control controls. They show that people with SUD
experience the substance more intensely than the control subjects (Bettinardi-Angres & Angres,
2010).
Other studies show decreased responsiveness to regular stimuli and an exaggerated response to the
substance of use. This increased response is often described as “the magical connection” as most
substance users describe the experience as extremely powerful when they first use their
substance of misuse. The magical connection sometimes is a paradoxical response such as an
opiate producing stimulation and an increase in energy instead of sedation The positive response
from the drug is stored in the memory and the user seeks to recreate the experience.
Unfortunately, the drug fails to provide the same response creating a vicious cycle of increased
use, tolerance, and withdrawal (Bettinardi-Angres & Angres, 2010).
Learning and Memory
Learning and memory are important components of SUDs with a
biological component. In response to rewards that the brain attributes as necessary for
survival, the brain creates neural mechanisms of learning and memory. In SUDs, these survival
memories develop around the substance. The user then becomes devoted to obtaining and using the
substance. Hence a user might have no considerations beyond the need to use once placed in an
environment of past use. There is a diminished capacity to incorporate new learning strategies
and shows decreased awareness of other reward systems or the need to invest energy in them. The
user shows poor insight into their behaviors as their need is fueled by survival-related clues
(Bettinardi-Angres & Angres, 2010; Uhl, Koob, & Cable, 2019).
Motivation
Motivation has also been shown to have a biological component. MRI
studies have demonstrated that the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for decision-making,
gets activated with the amygdala (the fear-based part of the brain), creating a connection for
craving. This activates a neurotransmitter called glutamate, which then creates an unpleasant
feeling associated with craving that can cause the substance user to try to reduce this
discomfort through substance use (Bettinardi-Angres & Angres, 2010; Uhl, Koob, & Cable, 2019).
Decision-Making
Neural mechanisms that enable people to reflect and choose
wisely appear to be weakened in substance users. The substance user is likely to move from
self-directed behavior to automatic sensory-driven behavior. Denial feeds off of the progressive
deterioration of decision-making. Denial is then reinforced by the powerful reward of the
addiction and the deficits in learning, motivation, memory, and decision-making
(Bettinardi-Angres & Angres, 2010; Uhl, Koob, & Cable, 2019).
Risk Factors
SUDs are influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental, psychological, and social factors.
These risk factors can increase the likelihood of an individual developing a SUD. It's important to
note that having one or more risk factors doesn't guarantee that someone will develop a substance
use disorder, and protective factors can mitigate these risks (Dugash, 2023).
Biological Factors
A family history of SUDs can increase an individual's risk
due to potential genetic predisposition. Variations in brain structure and function,
neurotransmitter imbalances, and other biological factors can contribute to SUD vulnerability
(Dugash, 2023).
Psychosocial Factors
Co-occurring mental health conditions, such as depression,
anxiety, or personality disorders, can increase the risk of SUD. A tendency to act impulsively
without considering the consequences and a desire for novel and intense experiences can place
one at risk for SUD. Individuals with low self-esteem and ineffective coping mechanisms may turn
to substances as a way of self-medication (Dugash, 2023).
Associating with peers who use substances can influence an individual's substance use decisions.
Having friends, family members, or romantic partners that use substances increases the risk
(Buckstein, 2023). Easy access to substances, whether legal or illegal, increases the risk of
use. Childhood abuse, neglect, or other traumatic experiences can contribute to SUD
vulnerability. Family dysfunction, a lack of support, or inconsistent discipline can increase
the risk (Dugash, 2023).
Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)
SDOH are conditions and factors in the
social and physical environment that can influence an individual's overall health and
well-being, including the likelihood of developing SUD and the outcomes for those who have SUD.
These determinants play a significant role in shaping the risk of SUD and its impact on
individuals and communities. SUD has been known to disproportionately impact the historically
underrepresented, underserved, and disenfranchised groups based on gender identity, race,
ethnicity, citizenship, sexuality, and economic status (Mulhern, 2022).
Access to basic needs has a significant impact on SUD risk. Poverty and economic instability can
increase the risk of SUD due to stress, limited access to education, lack of resources for
healthy coping strategies, and other factors. Unemployment or limited job opportunities can
contribute to SUD, as individuals may turn to substances as a coping mechanism or due to social
dislocation. Economic disparities can result in differential access to healthcare, treatment,
and prevention programs (Mulhern, 2022).
Unstable or unsafe housing can contribute to the risk of SUD. Homelessness is strongly associated
with substance use. Neighborhoods with high levels of crime and drug availability can influence
substance use patterns. Food insecurity and poor nutrition can negatively affect overall health
and increase susceptibility to SUD. Inadequate transportation can make accessing help for
substance use impossible to obtain. Easy access to alcohol or illicit drugs in the community can
facilitate substance use and addiction (Mulhern, 2022).
Limited access to healthcare services, including mental health and addiction treatment, can lead
to undiagnosed or untreated mental health conditions, which can contribute to SUD. In the United
States, Black and Hispanic patients receive less treatment than their white counterparts
(Dynamed, 2022). High levels of trauma, such as physical or sexual abuse, can increase the risk
of SUD as individuals may use substances to cope with their traumatic experiences. Trauma has a
lasting impact on health, even if it occurred many years prior, and can be responsible for
epigenetic changes (Mulhern, 2022).
Inadequate access to quality education and limited educational attainment can hinder individuals'
understanding of the risks associated with substance use (Mulhern, 2022). Individuals who are
unaware of the risks of substance use may be more at risk for experimentation and initiation
(Dugash, 2023). Insufficient social support networks, including family and community support,
can increase the risk of SUD. Strong support systems can serve as protective factors (Mulhern,
2022).
Discrimination and stigma can deter individuals from seeking help for their SUD due to fear of
social consequences, thereby exacerbating the problem. Those who are impacted by systemic
oppression experience increased stress. They may worry about their safety and how their lives
are affected by policy which can contribute to substance use (Mulhern, 2022).
Implicit bias refers to attitudes or stereotypes that subconsciously affect an individual’s
understanding, actions, and decisions. These biases can impact various aspects of healthcare,
including the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of SUD. Providers may be more likely to
overlook or underdiagnose SUD in certain patients based on characteristics like race, gender, or
socioeconomic status. In addition to those characteristics, it is very common for people to have
a substance use implicit bias (Ashford, Brown, & Curtis, 2018)
Implicit bias can contribute to stigmatization and discrimination against individuals with SUD.
This can lead to negative stereotypes, blame, and a lack of empathy or support from healthcare
providers. Patients who are perceived as more "trustworthy" or "compliant" may receive better
communication and engagement from providers, while others may experience dismissive or punitive
attitudes. Patients who sense bias in their interactions with healthcare providers may be less
likely to engage in treatment and follow medical advice, leading to poorer outcomes (Ashford,
Brown, & Curtis, 2018)
Implicit bias can play a role in the criminalization of substance use, leading to more punitive
legal consequences for certain groups. For example, individuals from minority communities may
face harsher penalties for drug-related offenses (Ashford, Brown, & Curtis, 2018). In the case
of nurses with SUD, implicit bias can impact whether or not coworkers report nurses who are
impaired or diverting medications. Bias can impact the consequences nurses with SUD face in
their careers. (Gabele, Keels, & Blake, 2023).
Addressing the social determinants of health is a critical aspect of preventing and treating SUDs
in individuals and communities. Interventions that aim to improve socioeconomic conditions,
increase access to healthcare and mental health services, reduce stigma, and provide educational
opportunities can reduce the risk of SUD and enhance outcomes for those with SUD. Comprehensive
strategies that take into account these social factors are more likely to be effective in
reducing the burden of SUDs (Mulhern, 2022).
Early Substance Use
Early initiation of substance use, particularly during
adolescence, can increase the likelihood of developing a SUD (Dugash, 2023; Buckstein, 2023).
The United States has a high rate of youth who have tried illicit drugs. Exposure to substances
in utero can also increase a person’s risk for SUD (Buckstein, 2023).
Cultural and Social Norms
Societal attitudes and norms regarding substance use
can influence an individual's perception and behaviors regarding substances. Some cultural
groups may be less likely to seek treatment. Others may hide their substance use. In some
cultures that normalize the use of certain substances, individuals may be at greater risk of SUD
(Dugash, 2023).
Stress and Life Events
High levels of stress, major life changes, or
significant life events, such as divorce or loss of a loved one, can contribute to substance
use. The relationship between stress and substance use is complex and bidirectional, with stress
contributing to substance use, and substance use exacerbating stress. Many individuals turn to
substances as a coping mechanism to alleviate stress. When people experience stress, they may
use substances to numb emotional pain or to temporarily escape from their problems (Dugash,
2023).
Stress can be a precipitating factor that leads individuals to initiate substance use. They may
begin using substances to fit in with peer groups, deal with stressors, or seek a sense of
relief. In those who are already substance users, stress can trigger cravings, which can be
powerful and lead to relapse for those in recovery. It can also lead to an increase in substance
use, as individuals may use larger amounts or use more frequently when they are stressed
(Dugash, 2023).
Chronic stress can lead to changes in the brain's reward and stress systems, making individuals
more susceptible to substance use and addiction. Stress can alter the functioning of
neurotransmitters like dopamine, which play a role in the reward and pleasure associated with
substance use (Uhl, Koob, & Cable, 2019) Understanding the link between stress and substance use
is essential for the prevention and treatment of SUDs (Dugash, 2023).
Gender (Assigned at Birth) and Age
Gender differences exist, with some
substances being more commonly used by one gender than the other. SUD is generally more
prevalent in men. Men are more likely to use alcohol and illicit drugs while women are more
likely to use prescription drugs. Age can also affect vulnerability, as adolescence and young
adulthood are critical periods for the development of SUDs (Dugash, 2023).
Co-occurring Medical Conditions
Certain medical conditions may lead individuals
to misuse prescription medications, potentially leading to a SUD. This includes mental health
disorders such as depression anxiety, and personality disorders, as well as chronic pain and
sleep disorders (Dugash, 2023).
Risk Factors for Nurses
In addition to the risk factors in the general
population, nurses have additional and unique risks related to the workplace (Toney-Butler &
Siela, 2022; Darbro & Malliarakis, 2012). Nursing is a very stressful occupation; nurses need to
frequently engage in shift work, long work hours (12-hour shifts), extra shifts due to
frequently recurring staffing shortages, shift rotations, and mandatory overtime in some
settings. These stressful work hours could contribute to developing SUDs. Trinkoff and Storr
(1998), examined the relationship between work schedule characteristics and substance use and
found that, in general, the more adverse the schedule characteristics, the greater the
likelihood of substance abuse.
Nurses are likely to witness trauma, violence, and multiple deaths throughout their career;
caring for patients with very high acuity; potential for transmission of infectious agents; and
insufficient staffing might result in heavy workloads all occur frequently in nursing and
increase the risk for substance misuse. Nurses’ ability to self-medicate and good knowledge of
the therapeutic benefits of medications can make them more likely to use substances (Trinkoff et
al., 2022).
Ease of access is one of the most remarkable risk factors of SUD in nursing and is an
occupational hazard. In a recent survey by Trinkoff et al, (2022), nurses in nursing homes and
assisted living; home health/hospice, and government/community/military settings reported the
highest prescription-type misuse. For a similar randomized population analysis completed 25
years ago, hospital nurses had the highest prescription misuse. Most hospitals have adopted
better systems of handling these drugs with automated dispensing systems, which limit and
control access, suggesting that workplace exposures could impact these differences (Trinkoff et
al, 2022).
Clinical Presentation of SUDs
SUD is characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations that result from repeated and
harmful use of different substances. These manifestations can vary depending on the substance,
the severity of the disorder, and individual factors. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM) outlines specific criteria for diagnosing SUD, which include a pattern of
behaviors and symptoms. People with SUD may experience cravings, which are intense desires or
urges to use the substance, which may be difficult to control. They may not be able to limit or
control substance use, often resulting in using larger amounts or for longer periods than
intended (Dugash, 2023). Tolerance is when a marked increase in dose is needed to achieve the
desired effect or when there is a markedly reduced effect from taking the usual dose (APA,
2013).
Withdrawal, another possible manifestation of SUD, refers to a group of unpleasant and
potentially life-threatening physical symptoms the individual experiences when blood and tissue
concentration of the substance decline in someone who has maintained prolonged use. Withdrawals
vary greatly among the different substances of misuse. Alcohol use withdrawal must include two
of the following symptoms: diaphoresis; nausea; vomiting; tremors; insomnia; agitation; anxiety;
seizures; or transient visual, tactile, or auditory hallucinations. Opioid use withdrawal is
often described as producing flu-like symptoms and includes three of the following: emotional
distress, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle aches, lacrimation, rhinorrhea, yawning,
diaphoresis, elevated temperature, and insomnia (APA, 2013).
Individuals with SUD may find themselves spending a significant amount of time obtaining, using,
or recovering from the effects of the substance. They may begin to neglect their
responsibilities, such as failing to meet work, school, or home obligations. Substance use can
lead to social and interpersonal problems such as conflicts in relationships, social withdrawal,
and challenges with family and friends. They may experience a loss of interest in previously
enjoyed activities, even ones that are unrelated to the substance use itself. Engaging in risky
activities while under the influence, such as driving under the influence or unprotected sex, is
another manifestation of SUD. Hiding or being secretive about substance use from others may
occur. Individuals may experience legal issues related to substance use, such as arrests for
drug-related offenses or driving impaired. Attempts to quit are often unsuccessful. Despite its
harmful manifestations, individuals continue using the substance even though they are aware of
its negative physical, psychological, or social consequences (Dugash, 2023).
Assessment of SUDs
Clinicians assess SUD through a comprehensive evaluation process that includes both clinical
interviews and standardized assessment tools. The assessment is crucial for determining the
severity of the disorder, developing an appropriate treatment plan, and monitoring progress over
time. The initial assessment often starts with a face-to-face interview with the individual. The
clinician will ask a series of questions to gather information about the person's substance use
history, current and past use patterns, and any associated problems. This interview may cover
areas such as the type, frequency, and quantity of substance use, withdrawal symptoms, cravings,
and consequences of use (Dugash, 2023).
Words affect how we see ourselves and one another. Labeling words creates stigma, stereotyping,
and discrimination. Individuals who are labeled are devalued. Bias and stigma can be addressed
by choosing a positive language. It is important for the nurse to use sensitive language in the
interview that decreases the stigma around SUD (see Table 2) (Ashford, Brown, & Curtis, 2018).
Table 2. Terms that perpetuate stigma and what to use instead (Ashford, Brown, &
Curtis, 2018)
Negative Terms | Positive Terms |
Addiction | Treatable health disorder |
Severe substance use disorder | Substance Use Disorder |
Substance abuse disorder | Substance Use Disorder |
Substance use disorder | Substance Use Disorder |
Substance dependence disorder | Substance Use Disorder |
Substance abuser, addict, alcoholic, or opioid addict | A person with SUD or patient |
Abuse | Misuse |
Relapse | Recurrence of use or return to substance use |
Recovering addict | Person in long-term recovery |
Abuse and dependence | Substance Use Disorders |
Quantification of substance use is important to keep the assessment as objective as possible.
This is easier for some substances than others. Alcohol use uses the number of standard-size
drinks. In the United States, the standard drink is defined by the National Institute on Alcohol
Abuse and Alcoholism. A standard-size drink equals 12 fluid ounces of regular beer, 8-10 fluid
ounces of malt liquor or malt beverages, 5 fluid ounces of wine, 2-3 fluid ounces of liqueur, or
1.5 fluid ounces of distilled spirits such as rum or vodka (See image 1). (National Institute on
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2023).
Image 1. What is a standard drink? (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism, 2023).
Risk thresholds for alcohol in the United States as defined by the National Institute on Alcohol
Abuse and Alcoholism are:
- For males (assigned at birth), five or more standard drinks in a day or more than 15 drinks
per week on average
- For females (assigned at birth), four or more standard drinks in a day or more than eight
drinks per week on average (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2023).
- Similar definitions for heavy drinking for gender minority populations have not been
established (Dugash, 2023).
Tobacco is easily quantifiable. It should be established whether the patient is a daily or
occasional user and how many cigarettes or portions of a package of smokeless tobacco are used
daily. When assessing long-term smoking history to identify possible health consequences, pack
years are used. To determine pack years, take the number of packs per day and multiply it by the
number of years the person has been smoking cigarettes. Prescription drug misuse can be
quantified by the dose and the frequency per day on average. There are no agreed-upon
definitions for unhealthy use of other substances. For some substances, any use is considered
unhealthy. Illicit drugs are much more difficult to quantify because the amount of drug compared
to additives can vary widely (Dugash, 2023).
The provider must also identify the route of substance administration. Substances can be consumed
orally, smoked, inhaled nasally, or injected into the subcutaneous tissue, muscle, or veins.
Patient education will be tailored depending on the route of administration, for example, if a
person is injecting a substance it would be important to discuss the risk of needle sharing
(Dugash, 2023).
Another important assessment, especially in those who use synthetic opioids, is an overdose
history. A history of an overdose indicates a very high risk of another overdose in the next
year. Those who are at risk for overdose can be taught how to mitigate their risk of death from
an overdose (Dugash, 2023).
Clinicians often use standardized screening tools or questionnaires to assess substance use. Some
common screening tools include the CAGE (Cutting Down, Annoyance by Criticism, Guilty Feeling,
and Eye-openers) Questionnaire, AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), and DAST-10
(Drug Abuse Screening Test). Depending on the substance and circumstances, structured
assessments like the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) may be used to gather in-depth information
on various life domains affected by SUD (Dugash, 2023). The American Academy of Pediatrics
recommends the CRAFFT screening to identify problematic substance use in the adolescent primary
care setting. CRAFFT stands for:
- C — Have you ever ridden in a Car driven by someone who was impaired
by a substance?
- R — Have you ever used a substance to Relax?
- A — Do you ever use Alone?
- F — Do you ever Forget things that you did while using?
- F — Do Family or Friends tell you to cut down?
- T — Have you ever gotten into Trouble when using?
Identifying substance use early can help decrease substance use in adulthood and mitigate some of
the negative effects (Buckstein, 2023).
A physical examination may be conducted to assess the individual's overall health and screen for
any medical complications related to substance use. This is especially important for substances
like alcohol or opioids, which can have several physical health impacts. In some cases, urine or
blood tests may be used to detect the presence of substances in the individual's system. This
can confirm recent substance use or help identify substances of abuse (Dugash, 2023; Buckstein,
2023).
Providers may use psychological assessments to evaluate the individual's mental health and
identify any co-occurring disorders, such as depression, anxiety, or trauma-related disorders,
which often co-occur with SUD. The risk of SUD is higher in those with personality disorders,
especially borderline personality disorder. Addressing comorbid mental health disorders is
crucial to treating SUD (Dugash, 2023).
It's important to assess the individual's social and environmental context, including family
dynamics, support systems, housing, employment, and legal issues. These factors can influence
the course of SUD and treatment planning. Information from family members, friends, or other
sources can provide valuable insights into the individual's substance use and its impact on
their life. The affected individual’s motivation and readiness to change their substance use
behavior must also be assessed to help determine the most appropriate treatment approach, such
as motivational interviewing techniques (Dugash, 2023; Buckstein, 2023).
Assessments are not limited to the initial evaluation. Ongoing assessments and monitoring are
crucial to track progress and adjust treatment plans as needed. Clinicians work closely with
individuals to develop a plan that may include counseling, therapy, medication-assisted
treatment, support groups, and other resources aimed at helping them achieve and maintain
recovery (Dugash, 2023).
Diagnosis
Pathological patterns of behaviors related to the use of these substances form the basis for the
diagnosis of SUDs. These patterns are present over a 12-month period. The four main criteria are
impaired control, social impairments, risky use, and pharmacological criteria. These groupings
are broken down into eleven criteria (see Table 3) (APA, 2013).
SUD is classified by severity based on the number of criteria present. Severity is described as
mild, moderate, or severe. Mild SUDs are estimated by the presence of two to three symptom
criteria, with moderate by four to five criteria, and six or more criteria in severe SUDs. It is
important to note that SUD exists on a non-linear continuum or cycle. Some individuals never
progress to severe SUD and changing severity over time is reflected in the increase or decrease
in use/criteria met. A complete report from the individual, a report from knowledgeable others,
a clinician’s observations, and biological testing are required routinely to determine severity
at different time intervals and establish the appropriate level of care (SAMHSA, 2019; APA,
2013). Substance abuse is addressed broadly in this discussion, in practice an individual’s
assessment should address the specific substance of misuse, such as alcohol use disorders or
opioid use disorders (APA, 2013).
Treatment
SUDs are treated through a variety of approaches, which can be tailored to an individual's
specific needs and the severity of their disorder. Treatment for SUDs typically involves a
combination of medical, behavioral, and psychosocial interventions (Dynamed, 2022; McKay, 2023).
Medical Treatment
Certain medications can be used to assist in the treatment of
SUDs. These medications can help reduce cravings and withdrawal symptoms. For example,
methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone are used in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Other
medications are also used for alcohol use disorder and tobacco use disorder (Dynamed, 2022).
Sometimes emergency treatment for SUDs is needed, such as in the event of an overdose. The
specific treatment for an overdose can vary depending on the substance involved, its quantity,
and the individual's condition. Patients with SUD and their loved ones should be instructed on
what to do if they suspect an overdose has occurred. If a substance overdose is suspected, they
should immediately call 911 for professional medical assistance. As much information as possible
should be provided, including the type of substance, quantity, and any observable symptoms.
Instructions from the 911 operator should be followed (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2023).
While waiting for emergency medical services, they should be taught to ensure the safety of the
individual and those around them. Remove any immediate dangers, such as sharp objects or
hazardous materials, and keep the person lying down if possible. If the overdose involves
opioids, and there is access to naloxone (Narcan), it should be administered according to the
instructions provided with the medication to temporarily reverse the effects of opioid overdose
and is available in some areas without a prescription (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2023).
In the emergency department setting, clinicians assess, stabilize, and provide appropriate care
to individuals who have used substances in dangerous amounts. Assessment findings can include a
decreased level of consciousness, constricted pupils (opioids), and decreased respiratory rate
and volume. If the person is in respiratory distress, has a weak pulse, or is unconscious,
immediate life-saving interventions, such as airway management, oxygen administration, and
intravenous access, are initiated. The specific substance involved must be identified to provide
appropriate treatment (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2023).
Individuals who have attempted suicide through overdose should receive a psychiatric evaluation
to assess their mental health and potential risk of self-harm. Appropriate interventions,
including crisis counseling and hospitalization, may be recommended (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2023).
For most patients who arrive at the emergency department with excessive substance use, supportive
care is the hallmark of treatment. Intravenous fluids may be administered to maintain hydration
and electrolyte imbalances may be corrected. Glucose should be checked and hypoglycemia should
be corrected if present. Medications to control symptoms or complications, such as antiemetics
for nausea and vomiting, may be given. Those who have ingested substances with delayed or
long-lasting effects may be admitted to the hospital for observation and further treatment
(Stolbach & Hoffman, 2023).
In cases of opioid overdoses, naloxone (Narcan), an opioid antagonist, may be administered to
reverse the effects of opioids and improve respiratory function. Naloxone is effective for
opioid overdoses and can be administered intravenously or intranasally (Stolbach & Hoffman,
2023). Side effects of naloxone may be mild such as nausea and vomiting or severe such as
hypertension, hypotension, ventricular fibrillation, or ventricular tachycardia. The patient’s
respiratory status and level of consciousness should be closely monitored (Vallerand, Sanoski, &
Quiring, 2019).
Emergency department staff often play a role in connecting individuals with SUDs to appropriate
treatment and support services. This may include referrals to addiction treatment programs or
counseling services. Individuals who survive overdoses should be connected with SUD treatment
and support services to reduce the risk of future overdoses. If possible, same-day and next-day
appointments should be made. Some emergency departments will initiate medications for opioid use
disorder, such as buprenorphine, although barriers exist to implementing these programs. To
mitigate the effects of possible future overdoses, intranasal naloxone can be sent home with the
patient for bystanders to use to resuscitate patients after an overdose (Stolbach & Hoffman,
2023).
Psychosocial Treatment
Various forms of counseling and therapy are crucial
components of SUD treatment. These may include cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), motivational
interviewing, contingency management, and family therapy. Therapy helps individuals understand
and change their behaviors related to substance use. For individuals with co-occurring mental
health disorders, integrated treatment addressing both the SUD and mental health condition is
important. Learning skills and strategies to prevent relapse is a key aspect of SUD treatment
(McKay, 2023).
Various forms of counseling and therapy are crucial
components of SUD treatment. These may include cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), motivational
interviewing, contingency management, and family therapy. Therapy helps individuals understand
and change their behaviors related to substance use. For individuals with co-occurring mental
health disorders, integrated treatment addressing both the SUD and mental health condition is
important. Learning skills and strategies to prevent relapse is a key aspect of SUD treatment
(McKay, 2023).
CBT teaches patients how to identify thoughts that lead to precipitating substance use and alter
those attributions to help guide a change in behavior. Education is a key component of CBT.
Patients learn about the cycle of substance use and addiction and identify the situations,
emotions, and thought patterns that trigger substance use. Through a process called cognitive
restructuring, individuals work with a therapist to challenge and reframe maladaptive beliefs
and thought patterns related to substance use and replace them with healthier thought patterns
to drive a behavior change (McKay, 2023).
CBT helps those with SUD learn new and more effective coping strategies. These may include
relaxation techniques, problem-solving skills, assertiveness training, and emotion regulation
strategies. CBT for SUD teaches assertive communication, how to accept and respond to
criticisms, how to decline a substance when offered, and stress management. If there is a
relapse, the therapist and individual analyze the situation to determine what led to the event
and how to avoid another in the future (McKay, 2023).
CBT can be used in conjunction with other therapies to treat SUD. For example, the community
reinforcement approach (CRA) and combined behavioral intervention (CBI) use CBT principles while
incorporating other strategies to address a wider variety of issues that patients experience
during recovery. For example, CRA includes couples therapy for those with partners, employment
assistance, and social activities. CBI uses CBT approaches along with motivational interviewing
and twelve-step programs (McKay, 2023).
Motivational interviewing is a client-centered, collaborative, and goal-oriented approach to
counseling and psychotherapy. It is designed to help individuals explore and resolve ambivalence
about change, particularly in the context of behaviors that are harmful or counterproductive
including substance use. First, a patient’s willingness to change is assessed. Then strategies
such as using empathy, reflective listening, and open-ended questions are used (McKay, 2023).
Case management can assist with access to housing, employment, and other social services that can
support an individual's recovery and stability. Involving family members in the treatment
process can be beneficial, as it can improve family dynamics and provide a support system for
the individual in recovery. Support groups like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics
Anonymous (NA) can provide a sense of community and a structured support system for individuals
in recovery. Some individuals benefit from complementary and holistic approaches such as
mindfulness, yoga, exercise, and nutrition as part of their treatment plan (McKay, 2023).
Care Settings
The choice of treatment setting for SUD should be based on a
comprehensive assessment of the individual's needs, the severity of the SUD, the presence of
co-occurring mental health issues, and the availability of support and resources. Treatment
settings can vary in terms of intensity, duration, and the level of care provided. The
individual's need for a structured and supervised environment is considered. If there is a risk
of severe withdrawal symptoms, the individual may require medical detox in an inpatient or
residential setting. The individual's motivation and readiness for change should also be
considered. Motivated individuals may benefit from outpatient settings, while those with lower
motivation might require more structure and supervision. Individuals with a history of relapse
may require a more intensive treatment setting to address underlying issues that contribute to
relapse (McKay, 2023).
Inpatient/Residential treatment is a highly structured, 24-hour care environment that is best
suited for severe cases or those requiring detoxification. Partial hospitalization or day
programs provide intensive treatment during the day while allowing individuals to return home at
night. Intensive outpatient programs offer more flexible hours and intensity compared to
inpatient programs but still provide comprehensive treatment. The least intensive option is
outpatient treatment, which typically offers individual and group counseling on an outpatient
basis (McKay, 2023).
The choice of setting should be made in partnership with the provider and the patient, taking
into account the specific needs and circumstances of the individual with SUD. Developing a
long-term recovery plan, which may include ongoing therapy, regular check-ins, and a support
network, helps individuals maintain their sobriety. The duration of treatment varies depending
on the person's needs and can range from a few weeks to several months or even years. Ongoing
support and aftercare are essential for maintaining long-term recovery. Success in SUD treatment
often depends on the person's motivation and commitment to change, as well as the support system
in place (McKay, 2023).
SUD in Nursing
Case Study
Linda is a new graduate on the oncology unit of a teaching hospital and today is one of the most
challenging days at work. Her co-worker Meredith was walked off the unit by the unit manager and
two security officers. Two hours later an emergency in-service for substance abuse was convened
for the weekend. Linda suspects that Meredith was taken off work for substance-related issues.
Prevalence
In the United States, nursing represents the largest sector of the healthcare workforce (Smiley
et al., 2021). Research studying the prevalence of SUDs among nurses is lacking, despite the
unique risk factors and potentially disastrous consequences of nurse SUD on patient care
delivery. In the existing literature, substance use among nurses is affected by different
variables, such as practice setting, stress levels, and the type of substance being used. For
example, nurses in positions with higher stress levels were more likely to have an SUD. SUD of
prescription drugs was reported highest amongst nurses working in long-term care and home
health. Those two settings also have the highest rates of alcohol misuse. Compared to the
general population, nurses use illicit substances less (Tinkoff et al, 2022).
Diversion in the Workplace
Diversion occurs when medication is redirected from its intended destination for personal use,
sale, or distribution to others (NCSBN, 2014). It includes drug theft, use, and tampering
(adulteration or substitution). Every organization that dispenses controlled substances has the
potential for diversion. Nurses with substance use frequently depend on diversion at work to
maintain their use (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022). Drugs are diverted in organizations at many
points. It is not easy to detect drug diversion. According to the NCSBN (2014), "Drug diversion
among healthcare workers is substantially underestimated, undetected, and underreported.” It is
therefore imperative for nurses to understand diversion, be conscious of the possibility of
diversion, and report any suspicion to their leadership.
There are several signs of potential diversion in the workplace that nurses should be familiar
with. Evidence that controlled substances have been removed without a provider’s order or for
discharged or transferred patients could be a diversion. If controlled substance containers
appear to be tampered with the substances may have been removed and replaced with saline. If a
nurse pulls higher amounts of controlled medications than the other staff, has high numbers of
overrides and discrepancies, or has a higher amount of wastage, it may be a warning sign of
diversion. Sometimes nurses who are diverting offer to administer pain medications to other
patients. Incomplete or late documentation, patient complaints of unrelieved pain, and patient
pain levels that are consistently higher for one staff member can also indicate diversion is
occurring Nurses can also observe for unexplained disappearances of staff or frequent bathroom
trips (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022; NCSBN, 2014).
Case Study Continued
Linda sits back and reflects at her time on the unit and her interactions with Meredith. On her
first day of work, she remembers feeling slightly nervous and lacking confidence. Meredith has
suspected her struggle, reassured her and offered to assist her with three patient medication
administration. That became a norm for her and Meredith.
Consequences
In addition to posing a threat to patients and other healthcare workers, diversion poses
significant legal and financial risks. Workers’ compensation, missed work, and decreased
productivity are all costly consequences for organizations. It also poses a significant risk to
patient safety because patients may receive substandard care from an impaired healthcare worker.
Patients whose medications have been diverted may experience insufficient analgesia or
anesthesia. There is significant liability, fines, and sanctions, and the unwanted notoriety and
loss of reputation (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022).
Prevention
At the organizational level, establishing a just culture where staff is encouraged to “if you see
something, say something” should be implemented. Staff should be trained to recognize and report
signs of drug use, especially environmental services staff. Sharps containers should not be
overfilled and should have small openings so that items cannot be removed. Organizations should
identify core competencies related to identifying SUD and diversion and educate all new
employees during orientation. Policies that address diversion, govern the safe disposal of
controlled substances, and outline reporting processes should be developed and implemented
(Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022).
The most common way drug diversion occurs is during wasting. It is possible to prevent such
diversion by reducing the need to waste controlled substances and managing waste disposal
appropriately. Automatic dispensing container overrides should be minimized. Organizations can
reduce waste events by buying unit doses and single-dose vials when possible. Staff should be
held accountable for waste according to policy, including using designated waste containers
instead of sinks. Staff should be knowledgeable about which medications are most commonly
diverted (see Table 4.) (Nyhus, 2021).
Table 4. Commonly Diverted Drugs (The Joint Commission, 2019).
Nurse Manager Considerations
To mitigate risk through the encouragement of reporting, nurse managers must play an active role
in helping their staff understand SUD and the need to promptly report any suspicion. Building on
scientific evidence that shows that SUD is a chronic illness needing treatment, the nurse
manager should encourage a culture of observing and reporting clues for the benefit of the
suffering nurse as well as the patients who entrust their care to the nurses (NCSBN, 2014).
Managers must be adequately informed on their facility’s policies and procedures as well as
their state’s nurse practice act and regulations regarding substance use disorder. Individual
states dictate the requirements for reporting to the board of nursing based on public hazards.
Nursing boards in many states have mandatory reporting requirements, which require nurses to
file reports about unsafe practices or misconduct by other nurses. In general, nurses are
required to report to another nurse who engages in the practice of nursing while impaired by
substance misuse or diversion of controlled substances (NCSBN, 2014). Nurse managers play an
important role in monitoring for diversion among staff. They must proactively observe for signs
of diversion in their units. Signs of diversion should trigger further investigation. Nurse
managers must know the organization's policies and promote a safety culture. Reports from
automatic dispensing machines should be checked regularly for discrepancies by day of the week
or time of day, overuse of overrides, and delays between pulling and administering or
administering and wasting. The nurse manager needs to inform their staff that the reports are
monitored and hold staff accountable for wasting according to policy (NCSBN, 2014).
Characteristics Encountered in Nurses with Diversion
Most substances diverted by healthcare workers are for personal use. A nurse engaging in diversion
might be at the earlier stages of substance use and might not present with any signs of impairment.
Noticeable signs of SUD for nurses often suggest that the nurse has been ill for a long time
(Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022). A nurse therefore should be prompt in reporting suspected diversion
irrespective of the suspected peer’s presentation. The nurse must also be aware of certain
characteristics that at face value appear as strength but denote a potential for diversion. There
are several typical presentations of a nurse who has SUD.
Super Nurse
A nurse with substance use may transfer from hospital to hospital,
work as a travel nurse, or work in multiple facilities to avoid scrutiny. She may have resigned
or been terminated within the last year. Nurses with substance use look for settings and
positions with insufficient oversight and easy access. Examples are a night house supervisor in
a small hospital or a staff RN in a procedural area. Nurses with a high level of achievement, an
obsessive nature, or a strong work ethic might use drugs to help them perform better. It is not
unusual for the nurse with substance use to be viewed as the most competent, well-liked, and
respected nurse on the floor (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022).
Helpful Nurse
The nurse with substance use might be very helpful with an
ulterior motive. They might volunteer to cover breaks and administer pain medication. They are
adept at identifying opportunities to procure drugs (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022). An example is
the charge nurse who gets to work early and immediately targets post-op patients likely to have
narcotics ordered. She can then proactively offer patients pain medication.
Nurses with SUD often work overtime. They may come in
early, or work late, allowing them access during shift reports. Overwork can signal weak
boundaries (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022).
Popular
The nurse with substance use can make people like them,
which decreases suspicion. A nurse with substance use is usually adept at manipulating others to
meet her needs (Dunn, 2005). She may receive glowing evaluations and be Employee of the Month.
Case Study Continued
Linda had great admiration for Meredith, she was loved by everyone, she moved so fast and always
had great energy. Besides helping her with patient’s medications faithfully every single shift
they worked together, Meredith began asking her frequently to witness wasting. Now looking back,
she remembers that during wasting, Meredith would be in such a hurry that it didn’t allow Linda
enough time to ensure rightful waste procedure are completed.
Presentations of an Impaired Nurse
Impairment is the inability or impending inability to provide safe, professional activities and to
perform duties due to a behavioral, mental, or physical disorder related to alcohol or drugs
(Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022). Nurses with SUD work while under the influence of drugs or other
substances. Although some manage to work and function marginally, eventually, they cannot perform
their jobs safely. They try to cover up their diminishing ability to provide safe patient care, but
their performance deteriorates, and their risk-taking increases (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022). More
detailed characteristics of nurses with SUD who are impaired are described in Table 5.
Patient care becomes a means to an end. The nurse's primary job is procuring the substance. Most of
the nurse’s energy goes into obtaining the substance and covering their tracks. Eventually, the
impaired nurse loses self-control (a sign of addiction). As time passes, they become careless and
reckless. In general, clinical judgment and performance problems are late indicators of impairment
(Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022).
Table 5. Changes in an impaired nurse (Dynamed, 2021; Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022)
Case Study Continued
During report that morning, a colleague shared with Linda that Meredith must’ve had a rough
night. She was very irritable, restless, and she couldn’t remember what surgery her patient
The Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic
In the United States, there was a marked increase in substance use and drug overdoses after March
2020 when COVID-19 was declared a national emergency (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2022). The
pandemic created many uncertainties for people worldwide. There were significant economic changes,
worsening isolation, and less access to care. Nurses have been at the frontline of the pandemic
since its onset and have been dealing with additional worker-related stress from the effects of the
prolonged response to COVID-19. It is expected that a shortage of workers, long working hours, and
stress will increase substance misuse among healthcare workers (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022).
Reporting and Barriers to Reporting
Impaired nurses are very unlikely to report themselves as a major challenge with addiction is denial.
There is a lot at stake for nurses with SUD: their career, livelihood, reputation, and social
standing are all at risk. Despite the risks, nurses often self-diagnose, self-treat, and do not seek
assistance from other professionals (Toney-Butler & Siela, 2022). When they do seek help, it's
usually after experiencing a climactic event, such as an adverse event being reported to their
employer or state board of nursing (Kunyk et al., 2016a).
Reporting impaired colleagues is essential for patient safety and the integrity of the healthcare
system, but there are several barriers that can discourage or hinder the reporting process.
Colleagues may fear retaliation from the impaired colleague or their superiors for reporting. They
worry about potential negative consequences for their own careers or working conditions. Some
healthcare workers may not be well-informed about the signs of impairment or the importance of
reporting. Lack of education and awareness can be a significant barrier (NCSBN, 2014).
Sometimes, colleagues may have suspicions about a coworker's impairment but lack concrete evidence.
They may be uncertain about whether their concerns are valid. According to NSCBN (2014), nurse
managers and colleagues infrequently identify substance abuse. They easily provide other
justifications for clues, leaving most nurses with SUD unidentified and untreated as they continue
to practice placing themselves and their patients at risk.
There is often a stigma associated with substance use and mental health issues, which can deter
individuals from reporting colleagues who are impaired. The fear of stigmatizing the affected worker
can be a barrier to reporting. Healthcare professionals often have strong bonds with their
colleagues, and they may hesitate to report someone they consider a friend. Loyalty and a sense of
camaraderie can make reporting difficult (NCSBN, 2014).
Nurses may be concerned about legal consequences, such as being called as a witness or being drawn
into a legal dispute, which can deter reporting. A workplace culture that does not prioritize
patient safety and encourages silence about impaired colleagues can deter reporting. A culture that
does not promote open communication and accountability can be problematic. Nurses may feel that they
lack support from their organization, including access to Employee Assistance Programs or resources
for managing impairment issues. Nurses at some organizations may believe that reporting impaired
colleagues won't result in any meaningful change, and the colleague will continue practicing without
intervention. In other settings, there may be a lack of clear and confidential reporting mechanisms.
Employees may be uncertain about how to report concerns and whether their reports will remain
confidential (NCSBN, 2014).
To address these barriers and encourage reporting of impaired nurses, it's essential for healthcare
organizations to establish clear and confidential reporting mechanisms, prioritize a culture of
safety and accountability, educate their staff about the importance of reporting, and provide
support to those who come forward with concerns. The protection of whistleblowers and the creation a
non-punitive environment for reporting can also help overcome some of these barriers (NCSBN, 2014).
The primary goal should always be the safety and well-being of patients. In 2001, the American
Nurses Association (ANA, 2016) Code of Ethics for Nurses was revised to address impaired practice
specifically: "Nurses must be vigilant to protect the patient, the public, and the profession from
potential harm when a colleague's practice, in any setting, appears to be impaired.”
Case Study Continued
The colleague who got report from Meredith shared with Linda that she would’ve never suspected
Meredith would be using substances. She felt shocked when she later found out she was reported.
Linda, too, was surprised and upon further reflection, she realized that her biases about
Meredith may have contributed to her missing the warning signs.
Boards of Nursing
The Board of Nursing’s first responsibility is to protect the public from harm. Once a complaint is
made, the Board of Nursing investigates and decides on an appropriate action for unsafe practice.
They can mandate that a nurse be removed from practice, seek treatment, abstain from use, and be
monitored (Mozingo, 2021).
There are two different regulatory options available to Boards of Nursing: Disciplinary action or
alternative-to-discipline programs (ADPs). Disciplinary actions are reported to databases, such as
the Nursys® data bank of the NCSBN. Each state has variations in disciplinary policy related to SUD,
but punishment does not help nurses with SUD overcome their disease. More congruent with recognizing
SUD as a disease, ADPs were created. ADPs are voluntary, non-public, and non-disciplinary monitoring
programs (Mozingo, 2021).
Nursing outcomes in ADP programs are better than those in traditional disciplinary programs, although
further research is needed to compare the outcomes of one ADP to others. Rather than experiencing a
lengthy investigation from the Board of Nursing, nurses with SUD are removed from the workplace and
provided with treatment. The goal is for the nurse to avoid disciplinary action, work through the
program, and eventually return to practice without restrictions (Mozingo, 2021).
ADPs are not all uniform and they can lack consistency, but there are some common themes across
programs. Most programs require abstinence from the substance. Some require participation in group
meetings, for example, a 12-step program like Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous. Through
the program, there may be restrictions on the number of hours and shifts worked (Mozingo, 2021).
Nurses can self-refer or be referred by an employer, another party, or the BON/BRN. However, a
referral does not guarantee eligibility. There are specific criteria for eligibility. Typical
admission criteria to an ADP include holding a valid nursing license, acknowledging there is a
problem, agreeing to take a break from practice until the program approves, and allowing for
evaluation. Reasons for being denied entry into a program can include past disciplinary action,
criminal action, or selling controlled substances. If the nurse is not eligible for the ADP, they
are subject to disciplinary action by the Board of Nursing (Bettinardi-Angres, Pickett, & Patrick,
2012).
Enrollment in ADPs is low. Nurses must quit working while in treatment, and many cannot afford to do
so. In addition to losing a paycheck, they may lose their healthcare benefits. Nurses may be
hesitant about the requirements and restrictions as well as the length of the program. A concern is
that nurses can potentially be in a program without their Board of Nursing’s knowledge. That means
an impaired nurse can avoid the Board of Nursing entirely and move to multiple jurisdictions to
practice. It can be challenging to find a balance between protecting the nurse’s confidentiality and
public safety (Bettinardi-Angres, Pickett, & Patrick, 2012).
Case Study Continued
A year later, Linda saw Meredith at the grocery store. Meredith shared that she is enrolled in an
ADP and is currently working on a limited basis based on the program’s requirements. She hopes
to be reintegrated into nursing practice soon. She has been free from substance use for over six
months.
Recovery
Recovery is defined as the act of regaining control
of one's life or returning to a state of health. Recovery involves
abstaining from all unauthorized, non-prescribed substances. Incremental
stages of progress measure recovery. There is a positive association
between bimonthly drug tests, daily check-ins, and staying in a program
for at least three years with successful program completion. Many nurses
recover successfully (Trinkoff et al., 2022). Often nurses with SUD are
bright and high achievers with a will to succeed. The strongest
predictors of success are a willingness to stick with a program,
admitting that there is a problem, and re-entry to work (Toney-Butler
& Siela, 2022):
Employment is a key functional index in addiction
treatment. Returning to work is a top priority for nurses with substance
abuse disorders. Nurses usually sign a contract to reenter the
workplace. Contract lengths vary anywhere from six months to five years
or on a case-by-case basis (Russell, 2020). Nurses are subject to
specific work requirements which may include more stringent monitoring
of performance at work, maintaining sobriety, meeting regularly for
check-ins, having a workplace monitor, and submitting to toxicology
tests. Those who violate their contracts can be terminated (Russell,
2020).
Every state program is different, but when returning
to work, practice restrictions typically may include working only during
the day and only on their assigned unit, a limit on overtime, no
on-call shifts or temporary assignments, restricted access to controlled
substances, and no working in a home or community setting. Some ADP
programs restrict travel nursing, working in hospice, working for
multiple employers, and working in ED, ICU, OR, PACU, or delivery rooms.
Practice restrictions are typically in effect for one year after
completing a program or on a case-by-case basis (Russell, 2020).
Recurrence is an instance of substance use that
occurs after abstinence. Recurrence is always a possibility due to
irreversible changes in the brain. The highest recurrence rate occurs in
the first year, with the highest rate being for alcohol use. A
recurrence can occur once or be a cycle of sobriety and recurrence
(Russell, 2020).
Table 6. SUD Resources
The role of nurses as both caregivers and vulnerable individuals underlines the urgent need for
comprehensive support systems, education, and destigmatization efforts within the healthcare
community. In the face of the ongoing substance use crisis, recognizing the essential role nurses
play and providing them with the resources and understanding they need to confront this challenge
head-on is not just a matter of professional responsibility but a crucial step toward ensuring the
health and well-being of both patients and those who care for them. Healthcare must work toward a
future where nurses are empowered to seek help, where stigma is replaced by empathy, and where
patient safety is always the top priority.